tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4953387045812787281.post1666987449319334320..comments2024-02-19T09:28:03.344+01:00Comments on Fritz and the Oscars: Best Actress 1965 - The resolution!Fritzhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03291268052797806635noreply@blogger.comBlogger8125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4953387045812787281.post-21724976915880445582010-03-20T16:03:37.002+01:002010-03-20T16:03:37.002+01:00Oh, that's great! So you'll be doing a ran...Oh, that's great! So you'll be doing a ranking after you see Monique? And 2001 would be a great choice! Very interesting year.joe burnshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01987519630654592530noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4953387045812787281.post-5543076917463695712010-03-20T11:55:59.682+01:002010-03-20T11:55:59.682+01:00I thought once about doing Supporting Actress. I c...I thought once about doing Supporting Actress. I could do 2001. But first I will update my ranking of the Supporting Actress winners so I will soon post my new ranking here.Fritzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03291268052797806635noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4953387045812787281.post-87840203515573005922010-03-19T23:43:52.125+01:002010-03-19T23:43:52.125+01:00Oh good! I'm just wondering, would you do a Be...Oh good! I'm just wondering, would you do a Best Supporting Actress lineup? If so, you should do 1975!joe burnshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01987519630654592530noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4953387045812787281.post-91551673725496956522010-03-19T16:48:32.296+01:002010-03-19T16:48:32.296+01:00Yes, I think 2004 would be possible!Yes, I think 2004 would be possible!Fritzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03291268052797806635noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4953387045812787281.post-54157917691118005312010-03-19T15:36:54.977+01:002010-03-19T15:36:54.977+01:00Sage could help you with the links! Or you could d...Sage could help you with the links! Or you could do 2004!joe burnshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01987519630654592530noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4953387045812787281.post-1225394213838071322010-03-19T09:24:15.696+01:002010-03-19T09:24:15.696+01:00Yep, 1978 is next.
I don't know about 2008 si...Yep, 1978 is next.<br /><br />I don't know about 2008 since I haven't seen enough of the movies...Fritzhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03291268052797806635noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4953387045812787281.post-12294504154886297162010-03-19T02:37:34.793+01:002010-03-19T02:37:34.793+01:00After 1978, can you do 2008?After 1978, can you do 2008?joe burnshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01987519630654592530noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4953387045812787281.post-70869452020333306832010-03-19T00:57:18.270+01:002010-03-19T00:57:18.270+01:00I knew it ;D
So, is 1978 still next?I knew it ;D<br /><br />So, is 1978 still next?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com